PPSN - ENAS 2008 WORKSHOP
September 13, 2008
Technische
Universität Dortmund, Germany
(See PPSN information at: http://ls11-www.cs.uni-dortmund.de/ppsn/ppsn10/
)
NOTE: PPSN - ENAS 2008 follows GECCO - ENAS 2007 Workshop
(See GECCO - ENAS 2007 information at: http://www.sigevo.org/gecco-2007/workshop-enas07.htm
)
Organizers:
Amiram (Ami) Moshaiov
Carlos A. Coello Coello
Yaochu Jin
Workshop Theme:
Multi-competence Adaptation
in Natural and Artificial Systems: Tradeoffs in evolution,
learning and development
Main Motivation:
The aim of this workshop is to understand
the similarities and dissimilarities between bio-inspired and bio-plausible
multi-competence adaptation.
NOTE - We use the term multi-competence interchangeably
with multi-objective to encompass both natural and artificial adaptation
processes.
Background:
Comparing nature and the
artificial has been proven to be fruitful for both bio-inspired design and
decision making, as well as for scientific studies of nature. Well known
examples of the former are soft computing methods and bio-inspired robotics,
whereas the use of bio-morphs to study "the blind watchmaker" is a
well-known example of the latter. Here, the focus of comparison is on
tradeoffs. Despite of the notions of
'fitness' and 'performance' often being considered closely related, the idea of
'Pareto-front,' which helps engineers to investigate tradeoffs among design
objectives, may appear strange or irrelevant to most biologists. Nevertheless,
tradeoffs are neither new to biologists, nor to cognitive scientists.
Bio-inspired and bio-plausible
parallel processing may be particularly useful in attempts to understand the
nature of evolution tradeoffs and the degree to which evolution involves a
"balance" between selection for multiple objectives. Or, in more
general terms, such computational tools could support the study of
multi-competence adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Evolution,
learning, and development could be considered as influencing adaptation in
different time scales. Hence we seek to understand the role of tradeoffs in
such individual modes of adaptation as well as in their combined situations. We
further want to explore, which are the most fundamental tradeoffs in natural
adaptation, and in engineering design. Some more detailed information is given
below.
Topics:
Metaphors and analogies in EC and in particular as
related to MOEA
Similarities
and dissimilarities between natural and artificial processes of adaptation
The
adaptation/optimization debate and its relation to teleology and the notion of
objectives
Tradeoffs
in natural systems and their comparison with tradeoffs in engineering design
and in multi-criteria decision making
Tradeoffs
in conceptual design and in natural "concepts" such as species
Tradeoffs
in co-evolution and in game theory
Tradeoffs in computational
methods including: Neural Networks, EC, Fuzzy Logic, Organic Computing, Bio-inspired
hybrid metaheuristics, DNA Computing, Quantum Computing, among others.
Tradeoffs in application areas such as: Control,
Robotics, A-life, Complexity Science, Informatics, Environmental planning, Economics,
Social Sciences, Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences,
A note on application areas and
computational methods:
Contributions on any application
areas and computational methods are welcome provided that a discussion is
included on the related aspects of multi-competence adaptation in natural and
artificial systems.
Format of Contributions:
Submissions
could be either as white papers, extended abstracts, or full papers.
For submission
details please contact Ami Moshaiov at: moshaiov@eng.tau.ac.il
Workshop Length:
Half a day