Machine Learning in Engineering Design and Manufacturing
- Reich, Y. and Steven, J.
Fenves (1988), Integration of Generic Learning Tasks, Technical
Report EDRC 12-28-89, Engineering
Design Research
Center, Carnegie
Mellon University,
Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
(HTML
file)
- Reich, Y. (1991), Constructive
Induction by Incremental Concept Formation, In Artificial
Intelligence and Computer Vision, Feldman, Y. A. and Bruckstein, A. (eds.), pp. 191-204, Elsevier Science
Publishers, Amsterdam.
(Postscript
file, 62K)
- Reich, Y., Konda, S., Levy,
S. N., Monarch, I., and Subrahmanian, E.
(1993), New roles for machine learning
in design, Artificial Intelligence in Engineering,
8(3):165-181.
This paper is related to the topic of knowledge extraction from databases
even if not a typical paper on the subject. This paper reviews the present
way of using machine learning in design and criticize it as being
restrictive. The underlying assumptions under present use are discussed
and new ways in which machine learning can be used in design are
discussed. The use of natural language processing (NLP) techniques is
discussed as well as the use of multiple machine learning tools (multistrategy). The integration framework for all the
techniques is, as you have already guessed ... n-dim. (Postscript
file, 783K)
- Reich, Y. (1994), Micro
and Macro Perspectives of Multistrategy Learning,
In Machine Learning: A Multistrategy Approach,
Michalski, R. S. and Tecuci,
G. (eds.), pp. 379-401, Morgan Kaufmann, San Fransico.
(Postscript
file, 392K, one figure missing)
- Reich, Y. (1994), Towards
Practical Machine Learning Techniques, In Proceedings of the First
Congress on Computing in Civil Engineering (Washington,
DC), pp. 885-892, ASCE, New York.
(Postscript
file, 127K)
- Reich, Y., Fenves, S. J.,
and Subrahmanian, E. (1994), Flexible Extraction of Practical Knowledge
from Bridge Databases, In Proceedings of the First Congress on
Computing in Civil Engineering (Washington, DC), pp. 1014-1021, ASCE,
New York.
(Postscript
file, 185K)
- Reich, Y. (1996), Modeling
engineering information with machine learning, Artificial
Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufacturing,
10(2):171-174.
(HTML
file)
- Reich, Y., Medina, M. Jr., Shieh, T.-Y., and Jacobs, T. (1996), Modeling and Debuging Engineering Decision Procedures with Machine
Learning, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering,
10(2):157-166.
(Postscript
file, 290K)
- Reich, Y. and Travitzky, N. (1995), Machine learning of material
behavior knowledge from empirical data, Materials & Design,
6(5):251-259.
(Postscript
file, 330K)
- Reich, Y. (1997), Machine
Learning Techniques for Civil Engineering Applications, Microcomputers
in Civil Engineering, 12(4):295-310.
Abstract: The growing volume of information databases presents
opportunities for advanced data analysis techniques from machine learning
(ML) research. Practical applications of ML are very different from
theoretical or empirical studies, involving organizational and human
aspects, and various other constraints. Despite the importance of applied
ML, little has been discussed in the general ML literature on this topic.
In order to remedy this situation, we studied practical applications of ML
and developed a proposal for a seven-steps
process that can guide practical applications of ML in engineering. The
process is illustrated by relevant applications of ML in civil
engineering. This illustration shows that the potential of ML has only
begun to be explored, but also cautions that in order to be successful,
the application process must carefully address the issues related to the
seven-step process.
Postscript
file, 430K)
- Y. Reich and S. V. Barai``Evaluating
Machine Learning Models for Engineering Problems,''
Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, vol. ,
no. , pp. , 1998 (in press).
Abstract: The use of machine learning (ML), and in particular, artificial neural networks (ANN), in engineering applications
has increased dramatically over the last years. However, by and
large, the development of such applications or their
report lack proper evaluation. Deficient evaluation practice was
observed in the general neural networks community and again in engineering
applications through a survey we conducted of articles published in {\em AI in Engineering} and elsewhere. This status
hinders understanding and prevents progress. This paper goal is to remedy
this situation. First, several evaluation methods are discussed with their
relative qualities. Second, these qualities are illustrated by using the
methods to evaluate ANN performance in two engineering problems. Third, a
systematic evaluation procedure for ML is discussed. This procedure will
lead to better evaluation of studies, and consequently to improved
research and practice in the area of ML in engineering applications.
[Get gzipped postscript|Zipped pdf]
Copyright © 1997-2005 Yoram Reich
Page URL: http://www.eng.tau.ac.il/~yoram/learning.html
Last modified: 4/16/2005 6:54:00 PM